Measure the change at your next review, not guess at it from photographs.

Heritage Documentation flies a drone or aircraft survey over your monument and returns a photogrammetric 3D model. That model is the baseline every later condition review compares against.

A roofless stone tower house standing alone in a green field, seen from a drone
Photo folder and notes

Measured baseline

GSD
UAV, under 10 cm
Spectral
RGB
Platform
Drone or crewed aircraft
Cadence
Baseline, then each review

Where a photo folder runs out

At the review you have last time's photographs and a condition form. You walk the site, try to find where the last photographer stood, and compare two pictures taken in different light from slightly different spots.

The top of the wall seems to lean further than before, so you write that down. Nobody can put a measurement next to it, so the note stays an opinion and the question goes to the next review, and to the next officer, with the folder.

A rubble stone wall leaning on a mossy slope among bare trees

One review, step by step

StepPhoto folder and notesMeasured baseline
Recording the state on the dayPhotographs from the positions you can reach on the ground, and notes on the condition form.A survey flight over the monument, processed into a 3D model, an orthomosaic and a point cloud, with a written record of the survey date and coverage.
Finding the same view againOld photographs, a guess at where the photographer stood, and whatever the light allows.The review flight is processed the same way and laid onto the baseline, so the comparison does not depend on where anyone stood.
Saying what movedTwo pictures side by side, judged by eye. “It looks like it has dropped.”The two models are compared, and a difference between them is something you can measure and point to.
Still yoursDeciding whether a difference matters. The comparison shows where two surveys differ. Whether that is movement worth acting on is a conservation judgement.
Evidence for a grant or a consentA folder of captioned photographs and the officer's account of how the monument has changed.A baseline record with the survey date and coverage, and extracts from the model that show the state of the monument on a named day.
The upper parts you can't reachBinoculars from the ground, or scaffolding and rope access when the budget allows.The upper masonry, parapets and roofline are captured from the air in the same survey, within the limits of the resolution.
Still yoursClose inspection. Looking at a joint or a crack with your hands and eyes, and calling in a structural engineer, stays on your list.

What arrives after each survey

  • Textured 3D model

    3D photogrammetric model

    The baseline itself, tied to ground control points. Delivered once after the first survey, then again after each review flight. It serves the rows on recording and on saying what moved.

    Ledger01 Recording the state on the day03 Saying what moved

  • Point cloud

    Point cloud export

    The same surface as measured points, for your surveyor to open in their own software.

    Ledger01 Recording the state on the day

  • Scaled image

    Orthomosaic

    A flat, scaled image of the monument, for GIS and for measuring across a face or a footprint.

    Ledger01 Recording the state on the day

  • Written record

    Baseline record

    A short document with the survey date, what was covered and how the survey was tied to the ground. It is the page you attach to a grant application or a condition survey form.

    Ledger04 Evidence for a grant or a consent

  • Comparison

    Review comparison

    At each review, the new model compared against the baseline, so the differences are laid out for you to judge.

    Ledger02 Finding the same view again03 Saying what moved

How it works

  1. Access and flight plan

    You tell us which monument, where a drone can fly and who holds site access. We agree the flight plan and any ground control points with you before anything is flown.

  2. The survey flight

    A drone or crewed aircraft flies the monument in daylight and a settled weather window, ahead of your review.

  3. Processing

    The photographs become a photogrammetric model, a point cloud and an orthomosaic.

  4. Baseline delivered

    You receive the model files and the baseline record. At each later review we fly again, process the same way and send the comparison against the baseline. The interval is your review cycle.

Limits

Daylight and line of sight
The survey needs daylight and a clear view of the monument from the air. Indoor spaces, covered spaces and anywhere a drone cannot be flown are not covered by this method.
What sub-10 cm resolution shows
At a pixel of up to 10 cm, the form of the monument is recorded well: the lean of a wall, a missing section, the run of masonry courses. Hairline cracks, fine mortar loss and surface decay are smaller than a pixel and are not recorded. A close inspection still does that.
Vegetation and shadow
Ivy, trees and deep shadow hide stone from above. Areas hidden in the baseline are hidden in the comparison too, and the record says where.
A comparison, not an alert
The comparison lays two surveys over each other. Nothing flags a difference automatically as a problem.
Not an engineer's report
This is a measurable record. It does not assess whether a structure is safe, and it does not replace a structural engineer's inspection.

Who it's for

Use this if

  • You are the conservation officer responsible for a monument's condition record.
  • Your reviews currently rest on a photograph folder and a condition form.
  • You want each review to have something measurable to compare with.

Stay with your photo folder if

  • The monument is indoors, enclosed or under cover.
  • Drones cannot be flown there.
  • You need a structural assessment, which is an engineer's work.

Questions before you book a survey

Does this replace a structural engineer's inspection?

No. It is a measurable record of how the monument looked on a given day. Judging what that means for the structure is an engineer's job.

How do we check it against our own records?

Put our model beside the photographs and measurements you already hold for the same monument, and see whether the features you know line up. You decide whether it is good enough to work from.

Can this show movement between reviews?

The differences between two surveys can be compared. Whether a difference is significant is a conservation judgement and stays with you.

What if the monument is indoors or under cover?

The method needs daylight and a line of sight from the air. Tell us before you book and we will say whether it fits.

How often should we re-survey?

That follows your own review cycle. We do not set an interval.

What resolution does it reach?

From a drone, under 10 cm a pixel. That records form and masonry courses. It does not record hairline cracks.

What files do we receive, and can we open them ourselves?

A textured model, a point cloud, an orthomosaic and a written baseline record. The point cloud and the orthomosaic are for your surveyor's and your GIS software.

Who owns the survey data and the imagery?

Ownership and licence terms are written into the agreement before any flight. If your legal team needs to read them, ask for them early.

How is a survey priced?

It depends on the monument, the site access and how many reviews you want covered. We price it for your site.

Set the baseline before the next review.

Tell us which monument and when the review falls. We will tell you whether a survey can be flown in time.